Insights — Channel Creation & New Revenue Streams — 3 min read
Should I Compete With My Own Distributors?
Competing with your own distributors is a high-stakes commercial move. Success depends on whether you are expanding the market or merely cannibalising it.

In short
Competing with your own distributors is a viable strategy only if you can reach customer segments that the distributors are currently failing to serve, or if the distributors no longer provide enough value to justify their margin. However, doing so carries extreme risks of partner churn and price erosion. The decision should be based on whether a hybrid model (selling both direct and through partners) increases the total size of the 'pie', rather than just how the existing pie is sliced.
The question of whether to 'compete' with your own distributors is one of the most contentious in B2B commerce. On one hand, the digital economy makes it easier than ever to reach customers directly, potentially doubling your margin overnight. On the other hand, a distributor network often provides the local presence, logistics, and technical support that a single manufacturer could never replicate.
Deciding to compete with your partners is not just a marketing decision; it is a fundamental shift in your business model. It requires a cold-eyed assessment of where the real value in your supply chain lies and whether you are capable of assuming the responsibilities that your distributors currently handle.
The Case for Vertical Competition
There are valid commercial reasons why a company might choose to compete with its own distribution network:
- Margin Capture: Removing the middleman allows you to keep the full retail price, which can be critical for funding R&D or expansion.
- Customer Data: When you sell through a distributor, you often don't know who the end-user is. Selling direct gives you the data needed for retargeting, cross-selling, and product development.
- Speed to Market: Distributors can be slow to adopt new products. A direct channel allows you to launch and iterate much faster.
- Brand Control: You have 100% control over how your brand is presented, priced, and supported.
The Case Against: The Cost of Conflict
The risks of competing with your own partners are significant and often underestimated:
- Mass Defection: If your top distributors feel you are undercutting them, they will drop your brand and move to a competitor. If you don't have the capacity to replace that volume immediately, the business could collapse.
- Price Erosion: When you compete with your partners, the primary weapon is usually price. This leads to a 'race to the bottom' that devalues your brand for everyone.
- Operational Strain: Moving from 'B2B shipping' (large crates) to 'D2C shipping' (small boxes) requires a massive investment in logistics and customer service.
- Complexity: You now have to manage two entirely different sales processes, marketing budgets, and customer support workflows.
The 'Co-opetition' Framework
Most successful businesses don't just 'compete'; they find a way to coexist. This is often called co-opetition. You can use the Growth Route Finder to see where this fits, but the core strategy involves:
- Tiered Product Lines: Selling basic versions direct while reserving 'Pro' or 'Enterprise' versions for distributors who provide technical support.
- Geographic Separation: Selling direct in regions where you have no distribution, but staying out of regions where your partners are strong.
- Order Size Thresholds: Handling small, 'nuisance' orders direct (which distributors hate because the margin is too low) while passing large leads to your partners.
Validate Before You Build
Before you set yourself up as a competitor to your partners, you must validate the commercial reality:
- True Cost to Serve: Map out the actual cost of a direct sale. Include the digital marketing spend (CAC), the increased logistics cost, and the cost of handling returns. Is the 'extra' margin still there?
- Market Mapping: Identify exactly which customers are buying from your distributors. If 90% of them say they buy because of the distributor's local credit terms or installation service, you cannot compete with that.
- Pilot Program: Launch a direct channel for a specific, non-core niche or a brand-new, unproven product. This allows you to test the systems and the reaction of the market without risking the core business.
When NOT to Compete
Avoid direct competition if:
- Your distributors are providing 'last mile' services you can't replicate (e.g., local stock for emergency repairs).
- Your products are 'low volume, high value' and require deep relationship-based selling.
- The market is small and everyone knows each other; the reputational damage of 'backstabbing' your partners would be terminal.
- You lack the cash reserves to withstand a temporary dip in wholesale revenue while the direct channel ramps up.
Commercial Reasoning: The Bottom Line
Competing with your own distributors should never be an emotional response to 'giving away margin'. It must be a strategic decision based on the efficiency of the channel. If a distributor is adding value (service, reach, support) that exceeds the margin they take, they are an asset. If they are just 'box shifting' and blocking your access to the market, they are a bottleneck. Only compete when the bottleneck is costing you more than the relationship is worth.
Could your business support another route to revenue?
Evans Channel Creation identifies, validates and builds additional revenue channels from capabilities a business already has — B2B to D2C, D2C to B2B, product to service, recurring revenue or partners — and says so plainly when a channel should not be built. Programme from £1,995 + VAT per month over six months.
Related services
